AIRBORNE FIELD MILL PROJECT
KENNEDY SPACE CENTER

SYNTHESIS FOR JUNE 07, 2001 - ABFM

Flight Summary (Non-Anvil Day)

Case 1 (Times: 1729 - 1936)
Type of case cumulus
Complexity moderate
Convection convective
Electric field
  kV/m
Min Em_m = 0.059
Max Em_m = 43.653
Mean Em_m = 11.047
Microphysics
  #/Liter
Max CON_FSSP = 707717.500
Mean CON_FSSP = 15778.219
Max Tot_con_1DC = 915.123
Mean Tot_con_1DC = 25.015
Max Tot_con_2DC = 626.009
Mean Tot_con_2DC = 29.191
Max 2DC_100_400 = 235.142
Mean 2DC_100_400 = 12.976
Max 2DC_400_1000 = 37.187
Mean 2DC_400_1000 = 3.415
Max 2DC_GT_1000 = 3.415> Mean 2DC_GT_1000 = 0.336
Location (x,y) ~ (-10,40)
Storm Motion 2.7 m/s east, 1.1 m/s south, gives: 2.9 m/s SE

Brief Description

It looks like this slows down as it approaches the coast.

Case 2 (Times: 1937 - 1950)
Type of case anvil
Complexity moderate
Convection no convection
Electric field
  kV/m
Min Em_m = 0.439
Max Em_m = 0.439
Mean Em_m = 0.439
Microphysics
  #/Liter
Max CON_FSSP = 2463.244
Mean CON_FSSP = 905.484
Max Tot_con_1DC = 36.147
Mean Tot_con_1DC = 9.315
Max Tot_con_2DC = 41.032
Mean Tot_con_2DC = 11.231
Max 2DC_100_400 = 18.656
Mean 2DC_100_400 = 4.424
Max 2DC_400_1000 = 6.859
Mean 2DC_400_1000 = 1.898
Max 2DC_GT_1000 = 0.442
Mean 2DC_GT_1000 = 0.172
Location (x,y) ~ (-60,-10)
Storm Motion 0.7 m/s east, 2.9 m/s south, gives: 3.0 m/s SE

Brief Description

comment

Case 3 (Times: 1950 - 2008)
Type of case debris
Complexity moderate
Convection no convection
Electric field
  kV/m
Min Em_m = 0.299
Max Em_m = 0.307
Mean Em_m = 0.303
Microphysics
  #/Liter
Max CON_FSSP = 178648.719
Mean CON_FSSP = 3678.550
Max Tot_con_1DC = 36.356
Mean Tot_con_1DC = 8.862
Max Tot_con_2DC = 37.936
Mean Tot_con_2DC = 10.079
Max 2DC_100_400 = 21.161
Mean 2DC_100_400 = 4.494
Max 2DC_400_1000 = 6.233
Mean 2DC_400_1000 = 1.522
Max 2DC_GT_1000 = 0.475
Mean 2DC_GT_1000 = 0.109
Location (x,y) ~ (-40,30)
Storm Motion 6.9 m/s east, 3.5 m/s south, gives: 7.7 m/s SE

Brief Description

This used to be the convection that created the anvilin Case 2

Case 4 (Times: 2009 - 2017)
Type of case cumulus
Complexity moderate
Convection covection
Electric field
  kV/m
Min Em_m = 0.121
Max Em_m = 0.121
Mean Em_m = 0.121
Microphysics
  #/Liter
Max CON_FSSP = 29646.941
Mean CON_FSSP = 1164.612
Max Tot_con_1DC = 45.653
Mean Tot_con_1DC = 4.446
Max Tot_con_2DC = 48.567
Mean Tot_con_2DC = 5.066
Max 2DC_100_400 = 18.206
Mean 2DC_100_400 = 1.871
Max 2DC_400_1000 = 4.588
Mean 2DC_400_1000 = 0.402
Max 2DC_GT_1000 = 1.250
Mean 2DC_GT_1000 = 0.115
Location (x,y) ~ (-10,10)
Storm Motion 0

Brief Description

Back through case 1?



There was quite a bit of lightning in the earlier stages of the flight.







SYNTHESIS FOR JUNE 07, 2001 - ABFM

Investigator: Jim Dye
[presented on Jan. 22, 2003]





        Flight Summary
Case 1 (~1737 to ~1935)

Type of case 
Complexity 
Convection 
Electric field 
Precipitation 
Location 

Focus Studies 

  active convection with small anvil moving to south
  many small cells of moderate intensity
  yes, active
  strong to moderate
  precipitating in many regions throughout the flight
  directly over and to west and northwest of KSC

 good for comparison with KSC Sfc Field Mills -- passes at both 7 and 1.5 km

Case 2 (~1936 to 2007)
Type of case 
Complexity 
Convection 
Electric field 
Precipitation 
Location 

Focus Studies 

  decayed debris and anvil
  this region inactive but active convection with lightning nearby
  not in this debris
  very weak
  no
  directly over KSC and to west

  time of E field decay from last lightning

        Instruments

WSR74C Radar 
NEXRAD KMLB 
LDAR 
CGLSS 
KSC Ground mills 
Airborne mills 
FSSP 
2-DC 
HVPS 
CPI 
GOES 
  possible Radome atten. after 1945, probably no significant precip atten.
  OK
  OK
  OK
  OK
  OK
  OK, but early in flt. and at low altitudes, frequent FSSP but little 2D
  not much 2D at low altitude, may or may not be a problem, otherwise OK
  OK
  OK
  some images


Brief Summary:
The satellite photos below show a broad area of convection over and to the west of Kennedy Space Center. The A/C worked two different regions of this complex cluster of small but moderate intensity cells which had radar tops at times to 15 km and produced lots of lightning. Case 1 was flown for the most part directly over Kennedy Space Center and the surface field mill network. Passes were made in and out of very active cells in which lightning frequently occurred. Aircraft passes were made first at 7 km and then the aircraft descended to make passes below the active convection at 1.5 km. The E field measurements from these passes should be interesting to compare with the Surface E fields from the KSC network.

For Case 2 the aircraft studied decaying anvil or debris from previous convection a little west of the active convection of Case I. The electric fields in this region were very weak by the time the aircraft began to investigate it.

LARGE AREA VISIBLE:         vis_1745     vis_1815      vis_1845      vis_1945

EXPANDED:          Florida_1745      Florida_1845      Florida_1945


METEOROLOGICAL OVERVIEW (LINK to be added)


Case I
1730 to ~1935
From 1730 to 1820 the A/C passes were made at 7 km in different parts of the cellular complex, sometimes over or through the convective cores and sometimes in weaker reflectivities from outflow or anvil. Throughout this period lightning was occurring in the region, sometimes close to the A/C. Consequently E fields were frequently large.
Filtering of the data to remove Citation measurements within +/-20 km and +/-5 min of lightning (any LDAR source or CG flash) removed all points between ~1728 to 1900.

At approximately 1746:28 the aircraft was struck by lightning. As seen in the MER plot below, M_Emag reached a peak of ~75 kV/m and the aircraft was on the edge of a cell with reflectivities of 50 to 55 dBZ at about 5 km. The 1745-1748 CAPPI without lightning shows the aircraft passed almost directly over a small, active cell. The CAPPI with lightning shows both LDAR activity and a CG flash near that location.
MER plot 1740 to 1750
74C CAPPI w/o Lightning 1745 to 1748
74C CAPPI w Lightning 1745 to 1748

The CAPPIs and MER plot below show somewhat typical passes of the A/C as it flew near the active convection and then out to the north in regions of mid and upper level debris with weaker reflectivities and weak E fields.
MER plot 1800 to 1810
74C CAPPI w/o Lightning 1804 to 1806
74C CAPPI w Lightning 1804 to 1806

LOW ALTITUDE PASSES NEAR KSC
Between 1820 to 1830 the A/C descended to 1.5 km where a number of low passes were made from 1830 to 1855 at 1.5 km below or beside the cells. From ~1843 to ~1850 the A/C flew pretty close to KSC, along or parallel to the coast. This may be a good opportunity to compare E fields aloft with those at the surface with substantial radar reflectivity aloft..
MER plot 1840 to 1850
74C CAPPI w/o Lightning 1846 to 1848
74C CAPPI w Lightning 1846 to 1848


Natalie Murray provided this plot showing some of the electric fields measured by some of the KSC field mills. Other plots from Natalie will be added. They show frequent (almost constant) field changes due to nearby lightning.
010607sfcFM.gif

Case II
~1936 to 2007
This was a study of a decaying anvil in which E fields had already decayed to weak values by the time of the first pass.
MER plot 1930 to 1940
74C CAPPI w Lightning 1938 to 1941

MER plot 1940 to 1950
74C CAPPI w Lightning 1946 to 1949

The last lightning from the convection which produced this debris was ~1830
74C CAPPI w Lightning 1827 to 1830

So time from last lightning ~1830 to weak E fields is <70 min, (1940 - 1830). However, there had not been significant lightning activity in this anvil debris since before 1710 with most of the active lightning occurring from 1645 to 1700 as this anvil was first being formed.
74C CAPPI w. lightning 1655-1658
I have a question on validity of CGLSS flashes for this day/period
lightning 1940 to 1950

SCATTER PLOTS of Emag vs. REFLECTIVITY PARAMETERS
In spite of the aircraft being very near lightning for the first hour and a half of the flight (i.e. until ~1900) and sometimes afterwards as well, the scatter plots for this case are very well behaved.
The plots for the entire flight data set for the Box 5 and Box 10 averages are shown below.
M_Emag vs Avg dBZ for Box 5
M_Emag vs Avg dBZ for Box 10

Scatter plots using the filtered data set will be added later.

END OF SYNTHESIS