|
Chemistry,
Aerosols, and Dynamics Interactions Research
The foci of studies on chemistry, aerosols, and dynamics
interactions are to examine the effect of physical and dynamical
processes on chemical species and to study the effect of chemistry
on aerosols and cloud condensation nuclei. Ongoing projects
within the program include studies on relating chemically
reactive species concentrations and fluctuations to the species
lifetimes, studies of the effects of boundary layer processes
on chemical species distributions, cloud chemistry process
studies, and prediction of chemical constituents on the cloud
scale to mesoscale.
A Model for Relating Reactive Species Concentrations and
Fluctuations to Lifetimes
Related website: http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/individual/lenschow/
Lenschow and David Gurarie
(Case Western Reserve University) have developed a simple
one-dimensional global model to predict mean vertical structure
and fluctuations in trace gas concentrations, as a function
of species lifetime in the atmosphere. A novel aspect is parameterization
of transport across the top of the boundary layer, and across
the tropopause, by an entrainment velocity. The three-layer
analytical model is applied to species with surface sources
that have lifetimes on the order of days to years, and generally
compares well with observations from several long-range aircraft
field deployments. A relation of this type is useful for estimating
lifetimes of trace gases in the atmosphere; or conversely,
if the lifetimes are known, average entrainment rates in the
measurement region. The model also predicts a relationship
among the surface emission, mean concentration, and lifetime,
so that, given any two of these quantities, the third can
be estimated.
.
Effect of boundary layer processes on chemical species distributions
To understand why turbulence-induced segregation occurs between
isoprene and hydroxyl radical (a reaction that plays an important
role in ozone production) when using a simple chemical mechanism,
while segregation does not occur with a more complex mechanism,
Mary Barth (NCAR/MMM/ACD)
and Edward Patton (Pennsylvania State University/MMM) have
continued analyzing and documenting the results from several
LES and box model simulations. Products of the isoprene oxidation
mechanism (e.g., organic peroxy radicals such as methylvinylketone,
methacrolein, and formaldehyde) that are not represented in
the simple chemical mechanism play an important role in determining
NOx levels. This, in turn, affects hydroxyl radical concentrations.
Barth, Patton, and Moeng
plan to use the LES code that represents both clouds and chemistry
to study the chemical transport and transformation in the
environment of continental fair weather cumulus. This work
will begin with examining the influence of cloud chemistry
(both aqueous-phase chemistry and gas-phase chemistry altered
by the separation of soluble and insoluble species). The influence
of clouds upon chemical constituents in the boundary layer
can be studied further by examining the importance of cloud-modified
photolysis frequencies, and by examining the influence of
cloud shading which reduces isoprene emissions and, therefore,
isoprene concentrations in the CBL.
Cloud Chemistry Process Studies
Barth, Sanford Sillman
(University of Michigan), Rynda Hudman (Harvard University),
Mark Jacobson (Stanford University), Cheol-Hee Kim (National
Institute of Environmental Research, Korea), Anne Monod (Laboratoire
Chimie et Environnement, France), and Jinyou Liang (California
Air Resources Board) performed an in-depth analysis of the
results from the cloud chemistry photochemical box model intercomparison,
which showed good agreement among models that are being used
in the community. Because parcels of air usually flow in and
out of cloud in a matter of minutes, the investigators examined
whether the chemical species were affected by the manner in
which cloud was introduced (either continuously, or intermittently).
Formaldehyde and formic acid concentrations (Figure 48) were
affected because of the timing of the formaldehyde production
during clear-sky intervals and its destruction during cloudy
intervals. The analysis also revealed that the time step used
for the chemistry calculations should be a multiple of the
cloud time step, otherwise deviations of the results from
more accurate solutions occur.
|
|
| |
| Figure 48. Total
(gas + aqueous phase) concentration of (a) ozone, (c)
formaldehyde, and (d) formic acid as a function of time
for the intermittent cloudy and continuous cloudy simulations
for the Barth-Gear (black), Kim-VODE (green), Barth-EBI
(red) at ? = 5 min, and Sillman-EB (blue) models. |
Cloudscale and Mesoscale Prediction of Chemical Constituents
Barth performed an analysis
of cloudscale numerical simulations of the 10 July 1996 Stratosphere-Troposphere
Experiments, Radiation, Aerosols and Ozone (STERAO)-Deep Convection
experiment. She investigated the relative importance of the
production and destruction of the soluble and reactive species,
hydrogen peroxide and formaldehyde, both of which play an
important role in the net production of ozone. Hydrogen peroxide
also is the key oxidant in converting sulfur dioxide to sulfate.
Results from the analysis show that depletion of hydrogen
peroxide in the cloud drops is offset by chemical production
in the gas phase, thus creating very little effect on total
hydrogen peroxide concentrations. Gas-phase chemistry controlled
formaldehyde concentrations in the lower regions of the convective
cloud, but in the upper regions of the convection, aqueous-phase
chemistry destroyed formaldehyde while gas-phase chemistry
produced it. This resulted in no effect in formaldehyde concentrations
for this region.
The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model must possess
the capability of simulating the interactions between dynamics,
radiation, and chemistry for applications in air quality prediction
and abatement strategies, and for the planning, forecasting,
and interpretation of research field campaigns. For the past
two years investigators have been planning the development
of WRF model components necessary for predicting chemical
constituents and aerosols. Barth and Skamarock assisted in
the development of a template, currently being created by
NOAA/FSL scientists, for what is now known as the WRF-chem
model. With the development of this template, the time has
come to advance the WRF-chem model to a research quality tool.
|