|
Advanced
data assimilation systems for community use (top)
Development of the WRF 3DVAR System
The WRF data assimilation system is the focus for the Mesoscale
Prediction Group's data assimilation efforts and has already
been applied in both operational, research and data assimilation
training applications. Barker,
Yong-Run Guo, Wei
Huang and Qingnong Xiao
have continued to extend the capabilities of the WRF 3DVAR
system. The capability to assimilate a number of satellite-derived
retrievals (SATEM thicknesses, SSM/T1 temperatures and SSM/T2
relative humidities) has been created. In conjunction, a study
of the quality of these retrieved products has been performed
indicating caution must be applied in their use.
Al Bourgeois and Barker
successfully merged the WRF 3DVAR system with the WRF
software framework in order for 3DVAR to run efficiently on
distributed memory computing platforms. An example of recent
progress in scaling the 3DVAR system to run on multiple nodes
of NCAR's IBM-SP "blackforest" machine is shown
in Fig. 12. The particular case studied is a 3DVAR run valid
at 12Z on 25 January 2002 in AFWA's 45km South-West Asian
"T4" 140x150x41 domain. Wall-clock time is reduced
from ~1370s (1 processor) to 89s (64 processors). Additional
tuning of background errors results in a reduction to 58s
on 64 processors. Although scalabilty is not perfect, a run-time
of under 1 minute is well within the time window of current
operational and research applications.
|
|
| |
| Figure 12.
Scalability test for 3DVAR run using AFWA's 140x150x41
45km T4 domain with the 25 January 2002 case study. Times
shown are for runs on NCAR's IBM-SP machine blackforest
with Winterhawk II nodes. |
Barker has compared numerous
methods for the computation of observation and forecast error
covariances. These include the default "NMC-method"
of forecast error covariances approximated via averaged forecast
differences, error estimation via fit of forecasts to observations,
and adaptive parameter estimation methods which utilize 3DVAR
analyses assimilating randomly perturbed observations. The
latter method has been shown to be successful in automatically
tuning observation/forecast error statistics, in response
to changes in observation network and/or forecast models.
The 3DVAR component of WRF is scheduled for official release
to the research community at the end of 2002. Support for
this new community data assimilation system will be key to
its success. Even before its release, the code had been used
by collaborators to assess the impact of new observation types
(e.g., SSM/I and ground-based GPS). This type of work is expected
to grow as the number of users increases.
Real-data applications of WRF 3DVAR
The WRF 3DVAR system has been successfully implemented in
two operational environments in 2002. First, after months
of testing and tuning, 3DVAR was officially delivered to the
Taiwanese Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) in May 2002. The
system runs as part of the MM5-based Advanced Operational
Aviation Weather System (AOAWS). Secondly, on 12 September
2002, WRF 3DVAR was made operational in numerous "theaters"
world-wide at the United States Air Force Weather Agency (AFWA).
These 3DVAR implementations represent the first use of a component
of WRF in an operational environment.
Figure 13 illustrates one month's Mesoscale Model 5 (MM5)
forecast geopotential height verification against radiosondes
for AFWA's "T3" (Europe) 45-km domain. The improvement
using 3DVAR (triangles) versus the previously operational
optimum interpolation (OI) scheme (squares) is clearly seen
at both 12-h (green) and 24-h (blue) forecast ranges. Not
only is 3DVAR producing superior forecasts, but the 3DVAR
implementation at AFWA is effectively computationally cost-free.
This particularly satisfying achievement is due to 3DVAR's
ability to "cycle" (i.e., use previous MM5 forecasts
as a starting point for the analysis). The 3DVAR cycling minimizes
spin-up problems (e.g., insufficient cloud) seen previously
in the early hours of OI/MM5 forecasts. The use of 3DVAR permits
the elimination of an additional 6-h MM5 forecast (previously
required to reduce spin-up via a "nudging" procedure),
saving more CPU than is required by 3DVAR itself.
|
|
| |
| Figure 13.
MM5 forecast height verification against radiosondes for
the AFWA's "T3" (Europe) 45-km domain during
the period 4 June-10 July 2002. Initial conditions supplied
by 3DVAR (triangles) and the previous operational optimum
intepolation (OI) scheme (squares) at hour 0 (red), hour
12 (green), and hour 24 (blue) forecast ranges are shown. |
Operational Application of MM5 3DVAR at KMA
Related website: http://210.107.255.13
Starting in April 2001, the MMM Division started to collaborate
with the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) on the
development of the MM5 3DVAR system, and its application in
operational regional numerical weather prediction. Through
collaboration with KMA staff, Barker
and Guo implemented a version
of the MM5 3DVAR into the KMA operational system. Guo
implemented the capability to assimilate observations from
Automatic Weather Stations (AWS) over the Korea peninsula.
The semi-operational runs have been conducted in Korea Meteorological
Administration (KMA) since June 2002. A web site: http://210.107.255.13
was setup to display the real-time results from the MM5 3DVAR
cycling run in KMA. This allows a side-by-side comparison
with KMA's operational three-dimensional OI scheme (3DVOI)
on a routine basis. The results have shown that MM5 3DVAR
performs, in general, better than the operational 3DOI scheme.
In particular, the use of MM5 3DVAR improves the operational
model's skill in quantitative precipitation forecast. Moreover,
the assimilation of AWS data is shown to have a positive impact
on the precipitation forecast over South Korea.
Development of Radar Data Assimilation with MM5 3DVAR system
Beginning in June 2002, MMM and KMA started to collaborate
on the assimilation of Doppler radar data into the MM5 3DVAR
system. The goal is to assimilate both radial velocity and
radar reflectivity data, from Doppler radars around the Korean
Peninsula, for mesoscale model (10-km grid size) initialization,
and to assess the impact of Doppler radar data assimilation
on short-range precipitation prediction. To enhance the capability
of the MM5 3DVAR system for radar radial velocity assimilation,
Xiao and Barker
improved the MM5 3DVAR system by including vertical velocity
increments in the analysis. Wen-Chau Lee (NCAR/ATD) performed
radar data quality control for a squall line case that took
place over the Korean Peninsula on 10 June. Juanzhen Sun implemented
a radar data pre-processor for MM5 3DVAR. Xiao,
Sun, and Guo developed
the radial velocity observation operator for the system. Numerical
experiments are now being carried out to test its capability
and to assess the impact of assimilating radial velocity using
a squall line that occurred on 10 June 2002. Different strategies
for radar data assimilation, including cycling at every 3
hours and every hour, will be tested.
Development and Testing of a Parallelized Version
of MM5 4DVAR
A major hurdle for using 4DVAR in operational mesoscale data
assimilation is the computational cost. The existing MM5 4DVAR
system was developed based on MM5 version 1.0. That code could
only be run on a single CPU and could not take advantage of
either the shared- or distributed-memory parallel computers.
As a result, the MM5V1 4DVAR system took prohibitively long
periods of wall clock time for data assimilation or adjoint
sensitivity calculation. Under the sponsorship of the High
Performance Computing Office of the U.S. Department of Defense,
John Michalakes, in collaboration
with researchers at Atmospheric Environment Research (AER)
Corporation and the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL),
developed a parallelized version of 4DVAR based on the latest
version of MM5.
Guo assisted with the testing
of the new MM5V3 4DVAR system. Initial testing certified correctness
of the tangent linear and adjoint model, once a few bugs were
fixed. Intensive tests were subsequently performed to assess
the efficiency of the code. With the INTERNAL-IO technique
implemented by Michalakes,
the speed-up factors reached 65.99 on IBM SP P3 and 196.03
on Compaq ES-45 for a large case (SESAME: 136x152x10, grid
size; 15-km, and 6-h assimilation window). This shows the
new parallelized code has the potential for operational mesoscale
data assimilation. Guo also
compared the results from this CWO-5 Beta code to the MM5V1
4DVAR system. The increments of the meteorological fields
are consistent with each other as illustrated in Fig. 14.
|
|
| |
| Figure 14.
Comparison of analysis increment produced by MM5 V1 4DVAR
with MM5 V3 (CWO-5) for the SESAME-I case. |
Optimal
use of existing observations & the potential benefits of
new observing systems (top)
Assessing the impact of simulated space-based lidar observations
on regional NWP
Barker and Qing-Hong Zhang
(NCAR/ASP) continued to collaborate with NOAA/Forecast Systems
Laboratory on the testing and verification of forecasts run
as part of an observation system simulation experiment (OSSE),
to assess the potential impact of a space-based lidar instrument.
Having verified the suitability of an MM5 nature run, they
began to verify RUC forecasts using simulated conventional
data.
Optimal
strategies for obtaining targeted observations in data sparse
regions (top)
Data assimilation experiments with Doppler radar data (4DVAR
and EnKF)
Crook, in collaboration
with Dowell, pursued a data
assimilation comparison study using Doppler radar observations
of the Arcadia, Oklahoma supercell. This was a tornadic supercell
that occurred on 17 May 1981 and was well sampled by two Doppler
radars. Crook applied a 4Dvar technique to assimilate single
Doppler radar observations into the cloud-scale numerical
model developed by Juanzhen Sun
(NCAR/MMM/RAP). Dowell used a second technique, the Ensemble
Kalman filter (EnKF), to assimilate the same radar observations.
It was found that both techniques are capable of assimilating
single Doppler radar observations into a numerical model and
producing reasonable convective scale structures (in terms
of cross-beam velocity, thermodynamics and microphysics).
Preliminary results suggest that the 4DVAR results verify
better (against the Doppler measurements from the second radar)
in the early part of the assimilation cycle but that EnKF
does better later in the cycle. While the assimilations are
clearly far from perfect at this early stage, they find evidence
that the EnKF is extracting useful information from the observations:
assimilating observations from one radar results in a steady
improvement, over about 30 minutes, of the fit of the analysis
to the observations from the other radar. Finally, short-term
(one to two hour) forecasts have also been performed from
the retrieved initial conditions. These forecasts have been
successful in terms of producing a smooth startup as well
as predicting the observed storm motion, but less successful
in predicting the storm evolution past one hour.
Comparison of 4DVAR and EnKF techniques for convective-scale
data assimilation
Sun, Caya,
and Snyder conducted a study
to compare the performance of the 4DVAR and EnKF techniques
using simulated data of a supercell storm. 4DVAR and EnKF
are the two analysis techniques capable of accounting for
the evolution of the atmospheric flow represented by a numerical
model. The 4DVAR technique was examined for the convective-scale
in the past and showed promising results. The EnKF is a relatively
new technique with some attractive features, such as it takes
less effort to implement compared with the 4DVAR technique.
The goal of Sun and her
colleagues' study is to determine whether the EnKF technique
has similar performance and robustness to the 4DVAR technique.
Using a simple cloud model and radar "observations"
extracted from the simulation of a supercell storm, identical-twin
experiments were conducted by both the 4-D variational Doppler
radar analysis system (VDRAS) and a recently developed EnKF
analysis system. The preliminary results suggest that both
of the techniques are able to retrieve the unobserved wind,
thermodynamical, and microphysical variables with good accuracy
when the systems were carefully tuned.
Assimilation of Surface-layer Observations Using EnKF Approach
Surface-layer in-situ observations are a rich, accurate,
and often dense data source; however, they are generally under-utilized
in current operational data assimilation (DA) systems because
complex interactions between the surface and the atmosphere
aloft are difficult to handle. Using these observations to
improve the initial planetary boundary layer (PBL) state in
a mesoscale NWP model could lead to better short-range forecasts
of convective outbreaks, slope flows, and frontal propagation.
Research by Hacker, Snyder,
and Anderson uses an ensemble
Kalman filter (EnKF) to assimilate idealized, in-situ, mesonet
observations into a PBL model. Because its response is expected
to be similar to the response in a mesoscale model, the model
chosen is a PBL parameterization scheme commonly employed
in mesoscale models. It is considered perfect for initial
experimentation. The EnKF approach is promising because an
ensemble of mesoscale forecasts can develop anisotropic background
error covariances. Hacker et al. demonstrated proof-of-concept
by running the PBL model in 1D and assimilating surface-layer
temperatures. The resulting state of the PBL was more accurate
than a state estimated with an idealized DA system as shown
in Movie 2. An error term, representing both model error and
forecast error that may be intrinsic to the real atmosphere,
was also introduced with positive results.
|
|
To view the movie, place mouse over image. Alternately,
for slower connections, you may use the links below
to download the movie.
PBL movie
(animated GIF)
PBL movie
(AVI format)
PBL movie
(quicktime format)
|
| |
|
| Movie 2. Potential
temperature profiles of the PBL, comparing no assimilation,
ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) assimilation, and idealized
assimilation (FDDA) of 2 m temperatures. A single case
is shown. No assimilation occurs before time ta and the
assimilation remains active until the end of the simulation.
The thick black line is the ensemble mean, the thick blue
line is the control ("truth"), and the red lines
show 10% of the ensemble members. |
|
Initialization and forecasting of a hailstorm
using radar observations from STEPS
Forecasting of individual convective systems presents great
challenges to numerical weather prediction. In order to examine
the ability of qualitative prediction of precipitation in
warm season convective systems, Sun
and Miller initialized a
warm rain cloud-scale model using single-Doppler observations
of a hailstorm from a WSR-88D radar and performed short-term
forecasting experiments. The model was initialized by assimilating
the radar observations for a period of 20 minutes, using the
4DVAR technique. A series of data assimilation and forecasting
experiments were conducted to examine the sensitivity of the
forecast, with respect to environmental, model, and data uncertainties.
Sun and Miller's
results indicate that the gross structure, location, and propagation
speed of the predicted storm have good agreement with the
observations for up to two hours. The sensitivity experiments
suggest that the forecast accuracy highly depends on the environmental
low-level moisture and the microphysical parameterization.
Assimilation of Slant-path Water Vapor Measurement with
Ground-based GPS Network
With the recent advance in Global Positioning System (GPS)
sensing technology, slant wet delay along each ray path can
be measured to within a few millimeters accuracy. Potentially,
this can provide high-temporal resolution water vapor measurements
at low cost. So-Young Ha (NCAR/ASP), Kuo,
and Guo performed a series
of observing system simulation experiments to assess the impact
of slant wet delay on the short-range prediction of a squall
line. Specifically, they assimilated slant wet delay data
from a hypothetical network of ground-based GPS receivers
using the MM5 4DVAR system. They showed that the assimilation
of slant wet delay results in significant changes in moisture,
temperature, and wind fields, within the boundary layer. These
changes lead to a stronger surface cold front and stronger
convective instability ahead of the front. Consequently, the
assimilation of slant wet delay produces a considerably improved
6-h forecast of a squall line, in terms of rainfall prediction
and mesoscale frontal structure.
In order to assess the additional value of slant wet delay
assimilation (as compared with zenith wet delay which is equivalent
to precipitable water measurements),
Ha, Kuo, and Guo performed
a parallel experiment in which precipitable water is assimilated.
They demonstrated that the assimilation of slant wet delay
is superior in recovering water vapor information between
receiver sites, and in short-range precipitation forecast,
both in terms of rainfall distribution and intensity. The
assimilation of slant wet delay more accurately retrieves
the temperature and moisture structure in the convectively
unstable region.
Impact of Digital Filter as a Weak Constraint in MM5 4DVAR
The assimilation of heterogeneous observations, using the
4DVAR system, is known to generate high-frequency intertia-gravity
waves. These high-frequency waves are caused by a variety
of sources: 1) insertion of data causing dynamic imbalance;
2) observational errors; and, 3) incompatibility between model
and observations. These high-frequency oscillations are not
meteorologically significant, and can reduce the effectiveness
of 4DVAR. Since inertia-gravity waves are acceptable solutions
to a 4DVAR system, the 4DVAR minimization may try to fit the
observations to these high-frequency waves. As a result, the
overall effectiveness of 4DVAR is reduced. Tae-Kwon Wee (UCAR/COSMIC)
and Kuo have introduced
a digital filter into the MM5 4DVAR system, as a weak constraint,
in order to control high-frequency oscillations which negatively
impact assimilation performance. To assess the impact of digital
filters, and to understand how the digital-filter 4DVAR functions,
a series of Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSE),
with the assimilation of Global Positioning System (GPS) refractivity
soundings for a cyclogenesis case over the Antarctic region,
were conducted. They showed that the weakly constrained 4DVAR
with digital filter not only reduces dynamic imbalance, but
also significantly improves the qualities of analysis and
forecast (Fig. 15). Without projecting its solution onto the
high frequency waves that diminish rapidly with forecast time,
the constrained 4DVAR is able to yield additional improvement
in model initial condition in the larger-scale range. Hence,
it utilizes the available observations more effectively compared
to the unconstrained 4DVAR. Wee and Kuo also showed that the
filtering of wind field is found to be the most effective
in suppressing high-frequency oscillations.
|
|
| |
| Figure 15.
Vertical velocity fields (cm/s) on the second layer from
the model top at the end of assimilation period in No-Digital-Filter
(left panel) and in Digital-Filter (right panel) experiments. |
|