A multi‐probe automated classification of ice crystal habits during the IMPACTS campaign
Schima, J., McFarquhar, G., Delene, D., Heymsfield, A. J., Bansemer, A. R., et al. (2024). A multi‐probe automated classification of ice crystal habits during the IMPACTS campaign. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD040895
| Title | A multi‐probe automated classification of ice crystal habits during the IMPACTS campaign |
|---|---|
| Genre | Article |
| Author(s) | J. Schima, G. McFarquhar, D. Delene, Andrew J. Heymsfield, Aaron R. Bansemer, M. Schnaiter, J. A. Finlon, E. Järvinen, F. Nehlert |
| Abstract | Although all ice crystals are unique, many can be grouped together by shape or habit, with members of a habit class sharing similar representations of properties such as fall velocity and growth rate. A decision tree algorithm designed to be adaptable to any particle imaging probe, thus enabling the creation of habit size distributions over a size range larger than that of any probe on its own, is used to classify ice crystals imaged by three airborne cloud probes in mid‐latitude winter cyclones during the Investigation of Microphysics and Precipitation for Atlantic Coast‐Threatening Snowstorms (IMPACTS) field campaign. Crystals are sorted into seven habit classes based on their morphological properties: sphere, column/needle, plate, graupel, dendrite, aggregate, and irregular. Although adaptability was its primary goal, the algorithm was found to be moderately skillful for identifying idealized habit images. Quantitative tests of the algorithm's adaptability displayed mixed results, as Two‐Dimensional Stereo Probe (2DS) classifications showed moderate correlation with Particle Habit Imaging and Polar Scattering Probe (PHIPS) classifications, but only weak correlation with High Volume Precipitation Spectrometer (HVPS) classifications. The algorithm was applied to random sets of images from each probe in a case study of a mesoscale snow band sampled on 7 February 2020. In the case study, qualitative analysis of particle images revealed general agreement on classifications among the probes, supporting the algorithm's applicability to multiple cloud probes. Most classifications appeared correct upon manual inspection, suggesting that in practical use, the algorithm is reasonably able to classify non‐idealized images. |
| Publication Title | Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres |
| Publication Date | Nov 1, 2024 |
| Publisher's Version of Record | https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD040895 |
| OpenSky Citable URL | https://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d78p64vn |
| OpenSky Listing | View on OpenSky |
| MMM Affiliations | DPM |